Golf has long been dubbed
a gentleman's game, but is it really? Maybe it depends who you ask, but I know
one thing for sure, what I've seen from golf fans on tv lately sure hasn't boded well for the notion.
Maybe it just took 10 years for the Billy Madison generation (wow- I can't believe that's been 10 years already)
to be old enough and affluent enough to get themselves into professional golf events, but something has certainly
changed in the past few years.
At the British Open last year Tiger Wood's final round played with Sergio Garcia was marred by a continuous
stream of never ending clicks from camera phones and annoying ring tones, even though cell phones were clearly
banned from the event. The rule was unenforceable because the R& A decided they didn't want lines for
checkpoints like in America. Wonder if they'll reconsider next year?
In a sport predicated on enforcing your own penalties and reporting your own score,
are we still playing a gentleman's game?
Last year, at The Buick Open, we saw a clear display of 21st century golf hooliganism at Warwick Hills' number 17.
The unique par three that allows over 15,000 people to crowd around a single hole certainly provides some
spectacular awe inspiring moments of brilliance. A roaring crowd, chanting a golfers name after he
sticks one within inches of the hole can give even the casual fan goosebumps, but the raw displays
of emotion can also cause some pains for the pros... you know- the ones we pay to see perform?
Even so, I think we can dismiss these displays of public over-affection as results of the game's increasing
popularity and as a small negative sidebar to what has been a true evolution of the pro game, from purse size,
to the level of competition, to the number of people playing worldwide.
But what happens when you move away from the professional world and look in-depth at us regular hacks, going
out and doing our best to master even a small part of this frustrating tease of a game? In a sport predicated
on enforcing your own penalties and reporting your own score, are we still playing a gentleman's game?
Leave it to the Canadians to be ahead of the curve with this one. If you have a moment, you must check out
this clip from a radio broadcast recorded in 1957.
If you are any kind of golf fan at all, you will get a real kick out of this short clip from the CBA Archives.
I wish I could find the rest of it. His description of cheating and the way golfers think- is still dead-on
today. I guess that means Canada is either ahead of its time, or just proof that integrity hasn't really
left the game, just that it never existed.
It's kind of like trying to lose weight, but lying to yourself and others about your starting point.
Us American's can just place blame on our nation's leaders. Thirteen of the past sixteen Presidents have
played, many to the level some would call addictive. Most notably, people point to President Bill Clinton
and his exploits on the golf course. He was known to take as many mulligans as it took to get it right, and
expected nobody to question his final results. The phenomenon certainly did not begin with him though.
Presidential Lies,
a book written by Shep Campbell and Peter Landau outlines and reviews how our leaders have played the game
and how their skill and respect of the rules reflects in their political policy. More recently,
First Off The Tee
hit the shelves. I’ve even read this one cover to cover and highly recommend it as a good leisure read.
So what does all this rambling mean? Should we feel bad about nudging the ball out of a divot after hitting
our first good ball down the middle of the fairway all day? Should we feel sleazy when we misinterpret or
ignore the rules when it comes to penalty strokes to improve our scores by a couple stokes? Should we be
appalled when our buddy uses 3 mulligans per side?
Probably, but many of us don't. That's why the advancement of the internet and sites like oobgolf.com can
be so useful. If you play by all the rules, you can get a true idea of where your golf game is at and
where you are really losing strokes. After looking at your stats from a few rounds, you may quickly
realize you don't need to be using those mulligans off the tee, because the real reason you are shooting
105 and not breaking that magic round number is because of your ridiculously high number of putts.
It's kind of like trying to lose weight, but lying to yourself and others about your starting point.
You would gain a lot more pleasure seeing the true results of your practice if you are honest about what
your handicap really is.
For me, it's time to come off my soapbox, and back to reality. I have certainly been known to fudge a
score or two, or claim double par on a disaster hole instead of putting out, but I'm trying to get
better with it. There's a reason I shoot the same score now, as I did 3 years ago. I'm a much better
golfer now, but I'm counting everything. Maybe some of the aura of "the gentleman's game" lies within
the bending of the rules, but I dare you to try it without for a couple rounds. If nothing else, think
chipotle mg says:who wrote this? i agree that honesty in score keeping is essential.
10/3/07
Kickntrue says:Who wrote this?! Some freaking genius I guess. He's probably so amazing he wouldn't even bother tooting his own horn- because he's so awesome. Hmmm... I wonder who wrote it?
10/3/07