Will the Real No. 1 Please Stand Up?
By mustang6560 on 3/14/11
Does golf benefit from having an outright No. 1 golfer?

It depends on who you talk to. If you ask a casual golf fan, I think they would say yes. But, if you ask a true golf fan, I think they would say not knowing who the outright best golfer is at this moment makes following golf on the weekends, especially Sunday's, more compelling.

Look at the WGC-Cadillac Championship. After 36 holes, it looked like Hunter Mahan was unstoppable. Then, Dustin Johnson shot a 65 on Sunday to take a two-stroke lead, only to have watch it slip away to Nick Watney on Sunday.

To the "I watch the Masters every year" golf fan, the "parity" in golf right now might cause them to further lose interest. No matter the sport, it definitely is hard to care about an event if you don't know the new faces who are playing AND if the person (team) you follow is not in contention. Having Tiger as the No. 1 golfer week-in and week-out definitely helped attract casual fans.

But, for the "I watch the Golf Channel seven days a week" golf fans, I think the fact that there is no outright No. 1 increases their interest in the game. Luke Donald won the Accenture Match Play and jumped from No. 9 to No. 3. Kaymer's second place finish was enough for him to jump Lee Westwood. Tiger fell to No. 5, Phil to No. 6.

Knowing that the official world golf rankings positions are subject to change on a weekly basis is exciting. When Tiger was No. 1, he had what seemed like a stranglehold on the top position for most weeks. In 2011, we could potentially see the most number one changes in a long time.

That goes back to the question at hand, does golf benefit from having an outright No. 1 golfer? And I think the answer is no. What's more important than a consistent No. 1 golfer is a great rivalry. Every sport needs a great rivalry and for the last few year's, it was Tiger vs. Phil with Tiger getting the edge. But, not only is Tiger struggling, Phil isn't doing anything exciting either.

Think about tennis, for example. You may not know anything about the sport, but you know to watch Roger Federer vs. Rafa Nadal any time they play a match, especially during the French Open or Wimbledon.

So what golf is missing more now is a good rivalry. I hope that golf can develop a new one between Rory McIlroy and Rickie Fowler? Southern California vs. Northern Ireland. Or maybe between Dustin Johnson and Bubba Watson. Battle of the big hitters. If they need any help getting a rivalry started, I'd be happy to start some rumors to get things heated up.

photo source

[ comments ]
JTW1 says:
Thats a great idea about starting a rivalry, I think I will go to twitter and post something on Dustin's and Bubba's twitter and see what I can get started.

JTW1 says:
@bubbawatson "I would love to see you and Dustin Johnson go head to head, could call it ”The Battle Of The Bombers”. Who would win???????????"

Put this on Bubba's Twitter page.
mattshaver says:
Parody in golf right now? Did I miss something, or should that be parity?
mustang6560 says:
@mattshaver- good catch!
mustang6560 says:
@JTW1 - i posted it on twitter. we'll see what happens...
tcjonny says:
in order to have a rivalry, there has to be some sense of animosity between the people involved. right now most of these new guns are so laid back and friendly, there is more of a camaraderie between them. if you follow most of them on twitter you can see the banter back and forth and how they go out of their way to be generally friendly and supportive of one another. I don't see Tiger tweeting Phil telling him he just had a great back nine or joking with him around the locker room. don't get me wrong, i think the animosity between tiger and phil is definitely overplayed, they are perfectly amicable to each other and great guys, but they just aren't 'buddies'. I mean, Phil's nickname on tour among the players is FIGJAM (F*** I'm Good, Just Ask Me).
Maybe there can be some more manufactured rivalries among some of these guys, we just have to find some that aren't hanging out together all the time. That would be great for TV.
mjaber says:
A rivalry... any rivalry... is always good for a sport. People who don't really follow baseball will tune-in to see the Red Sox play the Yankees. Same thing with the Colts and Pats. I don't think there needs to be animosity between the players, but I do think they need to battling week after week at the top. If a couple guys (let's say Kaymer and Bubba) were to go 1-2 in the first 2 majors this year, with each winning one, that could be the start of something special in terms of a "golf rivalry."
tcjonny says:
@mjaber - True, something like that could definitely manufacture some tension. I suppose tension is better than animosity.
Kurt the Knife says:
the only #1 i ever care about is the winner of the tournament i happen to be following.

I'm the #1 golfer in the world depending on the metric u use.

Like, the golfer with the most oranges on his desk right now.

gunny86 says:
we need some palmer/hogan animosity.
[ post comment ]
    New Products
    Caption This
    World Am
    How Bizarre!
Most Popular: