Justin Rose Penalized, Then Un-penalized
By Torleif Sorenson on 5/12/14
Justin Rose was rescued from the same fate Tiger Woods suffered at last year's BMW Championship outside Chicago.
During the third round of the Players Championship on Saturday afternoon, Justin Rose addressed his ball for a chip-shot at the 18th green at TPC Sawgrass. But when the ball possibly moved in the soft grass after Rose grounded his club, he stepped away. Rose even called over playing partner Sergio Garcia, who watched a replay on a large outdoor video board with Rose.
"We both clearly look at the evidence and look at the replay and say, 'No, absolutely the ball didn't move. But under 50 times magnification in the truck, maybe the ball moved a quarter of a dimple toward the toe of the club. Obviously, if the ball moved, it moved. And I get assessed an extra stroke penalty."Indeed, the PGA Tour slapped Rose with a violation of Rule 18-2b. His scorecard was changed to a 73 from a 71, leaving him seven shots in arrears of Martin Kaymer and Jordan Spieth.
But then on Sunday, just before Rose teed off in the final round, the PGA Tour relented and removed the two-shot penalty, based on Decision 18/4, implemented this past November in response to the cruel fate Tiger suffered just two months earlier.
In their statement, the Tour gave their explanation:
At the time of the review immediately following Rose’s round, in which Rose participated, it was thought that Decision 18/4 (Television Evidence Shows Ball at Rest Changed Position But by Amount Not Reasonably Discernible to Naked Eye) a copy of which is attached, was not applicable because the review of the footage shown in the telecast showed that the ball may have moved in a way that was discernable to the naked eye and when viewing the incident with Rose in the television compound, it was confirmed that the ball did in fact move very slightly. Thus, at the time, the Rules Committee deemed that the ball had moved in a manner that was reasonably discernable to the naked eye. The Committee, therefore, assessed the general penalty under Rule 18 of two strokes.
Read an interesting golf article? Tip Your Editor!
Image via Twitter
[ comments ]
Leave it to the PGA tour to take overnight to review instant replay.
If it wasn't noticeable by the naked eye what made him back off? The sound?
From what I have read, he backed off because he noticed it oscillate. He and playing partner Sergio then watched the replay on the jumbo TV beside the green, but both thought there was no change of position. So they played on... which Rose admits was a mistake - should have called a rules official over.
It was then later that the officials reviewed it using another camera feed which was higher resolution and showed the movement. Thus the penalty.
But then in the morning the reversion of the penalty. Weird.
Now, if this were Tiger, they wouldn't have cared in the first place and probably would have subtracted a stroke because it took so long to review the tape of something that never happened.
joe jones says:
Finally some common sense by the tour. And what the hell did this instance have to do with Tiger?
[ post comment ]