| View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Birdie King
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 4
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:47 pm Post subject: Dont use 9 holes on the best scores area on the course page |
|
|
The best score area would be alot better if it only used 18 hole scores. Look at some of the boards with only 18 hole scores they look alot better
|
|
 |
falcon50driver
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 1239
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, nine hole scores don't really mean anything by themselves, a proper score is through 18.
|
|
|
jerdman
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll third this. I've had great 9's that turn in to mediocre 18's. How many times have we seen a pro go out in 28 or 29, but not come close to the elusive 59 and finish the day in 10th place?
|
|
|
klangdon
Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 634
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The scores page on each course (linked on left of course page) allows you to turn off 9 holes. The only reason we allowed them to the front was just to fill in some course leaderboards with less scores posted. But as the sites traffic continues to grow, it will make sense to only show 18 out front as well.
|
|
|
Birdie King
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:55 pm Post subject: 18 holes only |
|
|
| klangdon wrote: |
| The scores page on each course (linked on left of course page) allows you to turn off 9 holes. The only reason we allowed them to the front was just to fill in some course leaderboards with less scores posted. But as the sites traffic continues to grow, it will make sense to only show 18 out front as well. |
When might this be changed? Thanks for great site
|
|
|
ipv6freely
Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 264
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree, especially since the course i play on has a super easy front 9 and a super hard back 9. So the concept of having a great 9 that turns into a terrible 18 is very much a reality for me. I never play 18... I figure once I can play the front 9 with a decent score consistently... then I'll move on to the tougher back 9.
|
|
|
klangdon
Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 634
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we are looking into possibly changing this within next month or so.
ipvfreely, ideally courses have seperate rating/slope for each 9 and the course leaderboard is ranked by differential which should adjust for an one 9 being easier.
|
|
|
jonnythan
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 19
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some courses only have 9 holes though, so at least keep the option to turn on 9 hole scores.
|
|
|
ipv6freely
Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 264
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| klangdon wrote: |
we are looking into possibly changing this within next month or so.
ipvfreely, ideally courses have seperate rating/slope for each 9 and the course leaderboard is ranked by differential which should adjust for an one 9 being easier. |
Ya I know, and mine does... just saying that the front and back 9s can be vastly different difficulties
|
|
|
cjgiant
Joined: 28 Mar 2009
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 04, 2009 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Being able to exclude or include nine hole rounds and 18 hole rounds from any score list would be great (to be redundantly clear: view either 9, 18, or both). It'd also be great if the same filter could be added to the reports.
|
|
|
|
